GO BACK
Discover the vast potential of a microservice-based frontend architecture! Learn how to leverage its unique benefits and unlock new possibilities.
In recent years, we’ve seen a meteoric rise in the world of advanced web development. Among these many innovations is an intriguing concept known as the microservice-based frontend architecture, commonly referred to as microfrontends. As technology continues to evolve and scale, the demand for more efficient and effective systems grows exponentially. This article will take you on an insightful journey exploring this modern architectural pattern. We’ll delve into its workings, benefits, and how it’s shaping our approach to developing robust web applications.
Unpacking the term “microfrontend” presents us with custom elements with an interesting perspective; ‘micro’, which points towards small separable units, and ‘frontend’, which refers to that part of a software application visible to users – the user interface (UI). Merging both elements grants us a powerful tool harbouring the potential to revolutionize frontend programming.
When diving deeper into understanding microfrontends, consider them as scaled-down versions of entire frontend applications. Built by breaking down an otherwise cumbersome and monolithic frontend back-end structure into manageable independent components or services – each responsible for distinct functionalities within the application. They democratize code ownership among multiple teams working on various facets of a single project – promoting flexibility and parallelism.
In essence, employing a micro frontends architecture provides teams with bitesize domains for concentrated effort without fretting over extensive dependencies or disruptions across other UI aspects. It symbolizes taking back control over your front-end environment whilst presenting considerable gains in delivering complex web apps and interfaces in high-performing environments. We’ve only just begun scraping at what makes up mfe or ‘what is a micro frontend’. There’s much more awaiting discovery! Stay tuned as we immerse ourselves further into this captivating realm in subsequent sections.
Microservices have revolutionized the back-end development process, but what do they mean for the front end? The answer is microfrontends, which essentially apply the microservice principles to frontend architecture. Implementing a ‘micro-ui’ can enhance your applications in several ways.
To help understand this concept, let’s consider what is a micro frontend. A micro frontend takes the idea of breaking up monolithic applications into small manageable modules and applies that to front-end code as well. It means splitting the web page into independent features managed by different teams, increasing efficiency in terms of speed and productivity.
The benefits of a micro frontend approach universal rendering are manifold.
Taken all together, these advantages make it evident why there would be growing interest around adopting frontend microservice architecture. However, note that nothing is universally perfect; with certain merits comes some demerits too – carefully evaluate your project needs before stepping in!
The concept of frontend microservices architecture, or “micro frontends” as it’s often called, builds upon the solid foundation established by their backend counterparts: microservices. This approach to software design breaks down a website or web application into manageable chunks, each with its own prescribed responsibility and functionality.
Diving deeper into how these micro frontends work could take us down a rather technical rabbit hole. However, a concise explanation can provide a basic understanding without overwhelming you with intricate details. Let’s break this
process down into three straightforward components:
At its core, the idea behind micro frontends is relatively simple – divide your frontend functionality up based on features, domains, or business units. Each team looks after their part of the interface from start to finish i.e., from the database to the user interactions.
Once divided competently, you’ll have small teams working independently on their respective parts using tech stacks that are most comfortable for them or best aligned to tasks at hand. Whether they choose React Micro Frontend techniques or prefer NextJS Micro Frontend technologies for accomplishing specific project requirements will entirely depend on individual teams’ proficiencies.
This feature allows different teams to adopt varying strategies for individual modules such as testing methodologies and deployment tactics etc., which default onto autonomous teams while working in sync with other teams’ functionalities when assembled.
One might wonder how disparate pieces come together seamlessly to form one coherent output? Various integration types like Server-Side Composition and Build-Time Integration help assemble all these UI fragments back together into one consolidated platform (frontend).
By doing so, users receive what appears as a single application despite being constructed through disjointed tasks working parallelly under unique domain-focused teams laying out ‘Micro UI’. Therefore entire application feels fluid and responsive conceding no indication of its fractured development cycle that has significantly given an edge over traditional monolithic models in terms of efficiency and subtlety.
As we venture deeper into the digital age, modern web applications have grown increasingly complex – an intricacy mirrored by their enlarging role in contemporary businesses. In this intricate tapestry of burgeoning technology, a term arises from the undergrowth – micro frontends architecture.
A manifestation of cutting-edge ingenuity, front end microservices present a novel approach to designing and implementing today’s web applications. They encapsulate both the functional and visual components of an application into succinct packages known as “microservices”. This enables developers to strategically deploy, update, and manage various aspects of an application separately.
In practice, developers can earmark specific teams for individual microservices. Every team has ownership over its respective microservice—from design to development and deployment—fostering more focused specialization within independent teams in the process.
Yet, another unique facet about these so-called ‘modern’ web applications is their ability to use myriad technologies simultaneously. Whether you’re using React for one component or Nextjs for another; flexible tech stacks are at your disposal within a singular project provided each piece belongs to different frontend microservices.
Indeed, with relentless advancement dictating the beat of technical evolution comes increasing complexity that must be managed proficiently by businesses demanding digital solutions. Interestingly enough, this need pushes towards embracing more refined paradigms like ‘micro frontend react’ or ‘nextjs micro frontend’. However crucial it may be not to neglect understanding the depths of adopting such methodologies before diving straight in—which will henceforth be elaborated in the following sections.
As our understanding of frontend microservices architecture deepens, it becomes crucial to identify the varied types of microfrontends that exist. The categorization can be characterized principally into three major classifications.
Firstly, there are “Isolated” micro apps or frontends, also termed as “vertically partitioned” or “vertically decoupled.” These typify the core principles of a micro frontend react application. They exhibit end-to-end functionality and incorporate dedicated codebases, which allows teams to work independently on their respective services without hampering productivity or causing merging conflicts.
Secondly, we find the distinctly organized type known as “Composite” micro frontends. Composite solutions break up web applications into discrete modules while maintaining user interface consistency. In this scenario, each frontend service owns part of the UI within a single page application typically managed by something like nextjs micro frontend composition. A complementary union between design coherence and functional fragmentation is thus achieved.
Lastly are the ‘Routing’ based fronts which provide an intermingling experience through various entry point services such as Container-based Widgets (Green Widget Ideas), Checkout Services or utility webservices (micro ui). Here, components route incoming requests to their corresponding pages taking full advantage of diverse tech stack possibilities. This method accords greater freedom whilst maintaining seamless transitions between different areas of a site.
Each type reflects unique attributes with its own set of strengths and challenges in attuning to the broad spectrum needs across different software projects. Therefore, furnishing an intelligible idea about these categories often aids in making well-rounded decisions when determining what type fits best for your project requirements.
Much ink has been spilled discussing the concept of microfrontends but before we delve into the heart of it, let’s take a step back and revisit its predecessor – monolithic frontends .
In ye olden times (well, not so long ago), front end architecture was typically organized as a single monolith. Many different components together were interwoven and any change required significant effort, making scalability a major challenge for developers. This hampered efficiency and speed in rendering new features nor responding to changes promptly.
However, with the advent of frontend microservices or ‘microfrontends’, such issues began to dissolve. Now let’s unpack this buzzword into actual practice.
Microfrontends use what is known as vertical organization or ‘vertical slicing’. They break down the potential behemoth that is your website’s interface into smaller, manageable chunks. Each one is crafted independently but functioning collaboratively – much like cells in an organism. The allure here is clear: you get modular codebases which are easier to maintain, giving more agility and promoting cross-functional autonomy.
Key aspects in vertical slicing include containerization where each section encompasses isolated data logic and UI representation; state isolation ensuring actions in one part do not disrupt others, and full encapsulation defining every element as stand-alone self-sufficient units.
The central themes encompassing frontend microservices architecture range from ease of deployment to enhanced testability.
Firstly, breaking down your front-end into micro web parts liberates them from stringent dependencies; now each web component can be developed separately yet function perfectly together. Thereby encouraging distributed development across different teams without fear of conflicting repercussions.
Secondly comes independent deployment. Agile transformation becomes easier when deployment can happen anytime anywhere – even if other fragments are under construction or being deployed simultaneously.
Thirdly increased production pace – Developement cycles run shorter by testing each fragment comprehensively on its own rather than waiting for every component’s completion before commencing tests.
Finally better application maintenance simply due to fewer codes generating less clutter thus allowing more efficient updates or replacements swiftly instead of undertaking extensive refurbishment.
Thus providing better performance experience over traditional robust systems that could take an ample amount of time processing vast volumes of information at once.
Advantages of Microfrontend Architecture
The implementation of a microfrontend architecture in web application development presents myriad advantages. From fostering a culture of autonomy, increasing efficiency in the software development cycle, to promoting innovation — its benefits are truly multifaceted. As rightly quoted by ThoughtWorks “A micro frontends approach can yield benefits that outweigh the inherent complexity of managing distributed systems”.
Moreover, with industry giants such as Spotify and IKEA embracing micro UI architectures, it’s clear that this methodology is gaining traction as a viable solution for complex frontend concerns.
But let’s delve deeper into these benefits and unpack just how transformative they really are.
When we talk about autonomy in the context of a microfrontend structure, what we’re actually discussing is breaking down traditional silos within your team spaces. Rather than dividing teams according to task function (e.g., UX/UI designers or front end developers), you can now organize them around individual technological elements—each distinctively belonging to isolate team code for different features or elements in your web app. Essentially speaking, each team manages their part like mini-startups serving one primary goal: efficient project execution.
Furthermore, this architecture’s adaptability factor allows changes—whether minuscule design alterations or massive system overhauls—to be done seamlessly which helps keep businesses agile and ahead of evolving consumer demands.
Next up is the unwavering focus that comes along with employing microfrontends; teams are allowed to specialize in singular aspects thus yielding higher quality output while avoiding unnecessary confusion that arises from handling various unrelated subsystems at once.
Lastly but most intriguingly—microfrontends act as incubation centers for fresh ideas; experimenting with cutting-edge technologies becomes much safer given that tests occur on isolated parts of your application mitigating risks associated with widespread implementation errors.
Embracing a microfrontend architecture ultimately puts teams ahead in terms of processes and product evolution – evidently showcasing why it’s an excellent choice for modern-day, frontend development undertakings.
When to Use Microfrontends?
If you’re considering frontend microservices architecture, it’s essential to understand when and how these robust systems might best serve your project. But remember, as with any architectural decisions, what works well in one scenario might not be as successful in another. It depends heavily on the specific demands or constraints of your web application.
React has positioned itself as an integral player within the wider field of micro frontend application front end microservices over recent years. Known for its flexibility and reusable components, React has become a staple for implementing micro frontend architecture so that different teams can work independently on distinct sections without disturbing the entire system. This versatility means that I tend to recommend React-based micro UIs if you’re planning an intricate web application where scalability and resilience are high priorities.
As a comprehensive framework that compels you towards specific patterns such as type safety and reactive programming, Angular is ideally suited for a micro frontend react layout wherein control over standards enforcement across teams is desired. With its declarative templates backed by dependency injection, end-to-end tooling, and built-in best practices designed out-of-the-box to ease development workflow, Angular lends itself very naturally well to complex applications seeking consistent flow despite being under numerous developers’ arms.
Nextjs brings some promising opportunities to those interested in leveraging the merits of frontend microservices architecture. The combination of server-side rendering (SSR) capabilities provided by Nextjs along with the isolation properties strongly endorsed by micro frontends can form up a brilliant duo – ensuring both superior user experience through faster page loading time and independent deployability by code segregation basis business functionality respectively.
The choice between React, Angular or Nextjs does not have a definitive answer—it relies significantly on recognizing your product requirements accurately. You should consider factors like how mature is your software development process? What level of freedom do you want developers to have while designing their services? Or perhaps most importantly – will this technology fit seamlessly into your already existing tech stack?
Remember that throughout the selection realm amongst frameworks/languages for implementing front end microservices- there are pros & cons at every step which warrant thorough evaluation before adoption into your particular environment—after all—it’s here where much innovation today is happening across businesses worldwide!
The utilization of the most frontend code and end microservices such as Micro frontend React or Nextjs micro frontend in your web development strategy needs deliberate planning and adherence to specific principles. These best practices not only steer your project to successful completion, but they also ensure an effective and scalable solution.
A fundamental benefit of using micro frontends architecture involves nurturing team autonomy. Each group responsible for a particular service should be able to work independently, yet also align with the overall system goal.
• The teams need to have full control over their respective realms: from writing codes, testing their functionality, deploying them, and maintaining after deployment.
This approach lessens complex dependencies between teams and enhances productivity since no single team waits on another’s output—thus effectively utilizing the advantages that come with microservices like react micro frontend.
Testing is an indispensable part of any software development process, and when dealing with micro frontends, it is crucial more than ever. Design different test strategies for various code levels. There are numerous tests you can include in the pipeline:
By ensuring all these tests are implemented within your workflow using tools that support your chosen UI library (React, Angular), you provide stability and reliability across all deployed modules.
Another aspect of employing best practices involves acknowledging occasional failures – this acceptance will guide you towards creating fallback mechanisms whenever errors arise; thereby enhancing user experience despite encountering small hiccups.
Begin by studying how each service interacts with others under normal operation conditions; then deduce strategies for handling instances where one or several services fail.
While encouraging autonomous deployments may potentially cause diversions in how each subsystem behaves or appears visually – leading to inconsistency in UX/UI designs which could confuse users – preventing this twist becomes necessary while implementing Micro frontends Architecture.
Ensure shared design elements such as fonts, colors, common components do not deviate from established norms. A style guide coupled with a pattern library represents exceptional resources for preventing divergence amongst developing teams’ outputs while offering aesthetic consistency across multiple applications or websites equally integrating react micro frontend framework or nextjs micro frontend if used extensively in your projects.
In conclusion, following these best practices contributes substantially to getting optimal results from your venture into the world of Micro Frontend Architecture while helping build reliable solutions scaled efficiently for large application usage simultaneously aiding Web Application maintainability down-the-road.
Recognizing the potential of frontend microservices architecture, many tech firms have integrated this approach into their operations. Among them is the noted technology solutions company, Aplyca.
Aplyca understands that the complexity of modern web applications often goes beyond traditional monolithic frontends , expanding to intricate landscapes where each part needs precise attention. Consequently, they’ve adopted a microfrontend approach in building their systems to ensure enhanced modularity and scalability.
Micro frontends offer multiple benefits to organizations like Aplyca.
They decrease the complexity in managing front-end tasks by dividing large systems into smaller, more manageable components. This results in increased team autonomy as individual teams can work on specific modules without negatively impacting other parts of the system.
In addition, Aplyca’s adoption of the ‘micro UI’ method – a key characteristic of micro frontend infrastructure – has enabled them to create custom widgets for various requirements utilising technologies such as React or Angular. The flexibility offered by these green widget ideas leads to improved customer satisfaction thanks to faster response times and higher quality outputs.
What sets Aplyca apart from other users of front end microservices is their aptitude for harnessing these benefits while also mitigating potential challenges related to consistency and performance.
For instance, although implementing different frameworks may lead to inconsistencies across design elements or user experience, Aplyca tackles this challenge using solid governance structures around UX/UI standards that still allow for innovation within boundaries defined by these standardisations.
Their proactive management ensures peak performance even with increased network latency that might stem from loading bits and pieces from different servers due to the decentralized nature of microfrontends. Their frontend architecture system smartly pulls together everything needed at just the right time.
Overall, what one can learn from observing how companies like Aplyca use “mfe” (short form for microfrontends) techniques will provide valuable insights for anyone trying to grapple with nextjs micro frontend tools or any other peripheral issues associated with such deployments.
Scaling frontend architectures, particularly front end microservices, is all about balancing the elements of complexity, service independence, performance and security. These have a direct correlation as well as a profound influence on key aspects such as Server Side Composition, Build Time Integration and Runtimes.
Server-side composition is one of the foundational pillars in scaling front-end architecture, especially when dealing with complex micro web structures. It’s an approach that allows individual microservices to be assembled on the server side before being transferred to the client. This results in a unified view that hides technical complexities from users while ensuring smooth operations underneath.
Next comes build-time integration, another essential strategy helpful for react micro frontend or any other similar architectures. In essence, this technique pre-compiles each service during build time into a single unit that contains everything needed to execute it correctly.
1. High Consistency: Ensures highly consistent user experience since developers can control every aspect of their application’s output.
2. Increments Are Testable: Small increments are fully testable which result in low scale failure scopes.
However, integrating services at build time requires strict coordination among developer teams avoiding drifts between expected behavior and actual user experiences that could rise from independent deployment scenarios.
In terms of runtime options available for frontend architecture including nextjs micro frontend applications, running through JavaScript seems most engaging considering its wide acceptance and universal browser support.
Running via JavaScript – often involves including relevant scripts in various parts of your codebase – offers impressive benefits but also presents unique challenges like potential namespace clashes or varying versions handling by browsers.
Despite these constraints, JavaScript still prevails due to accessibility and seamless communication opportunities among different parts of an app provided by the dynamic language.
For those favoring scalability along with modularization & reusability – Runtime via Web Components serves perfectly aligning well with green widget ideas of environmental efficiency delivered via technological advancements.
Web components work towards the same framework of improved HTML functionality resulting in custom reusable HTML tags adapted across entire applications without concern for conflicts making them prime choice for large projects maintaining independent subsidiary components under one umbrella structure (source).
One more viable option for realizing scalable frontend fabric within its infrastructure, specifically where isolation is concerned, takes shape through runtime via iframes.
Although fallen out of the major spotlight recently given issues related to performance overheads & SEO visibility; implementing iframes remains a great choice offering tight sandboxing while imparting distinct breathing space for each component not disturbing others alongside.
In delving into the potentially complex world of frontend microservices architecture, one cannot deny that Microfrontends prove to be an increasingly valuable resource for modern web development. This innovative approach allows developers not only to simplify their workload but also to deliver robust and scalable applications in a remarkably efficient way.
Whether we’re talking about Microfrontends with React, Angular, or Next.js – all are crucial entities in carving this new path forward for frontend design, each offering unique advantages and tools for implementation. However, it’s key to remember that like any architectural style, making use of Microfrontends comes down to your project’s specific needs and goals.
It’s undoubtedly exciting to see how this area of software engineering is continuing to evolve. Based on studies by respected technology analysts such as Gartner and Forrester Research, it appears clear that Microfrontends will remain more than just a fad – they will continue playing a pivotal role in shaping the future landscape of Web application development across industries. This involves facilitating work across multiple teams using the same framework, incorporating server-side rendering to enhance performance, enabling independent teams to work on different aspects of a web app, utilizing web components for modularity, employing universal rendering techniques for seamless client and server integration, leveraging browser events for dynamic user experiences, adhering to the web component spec for standardization, ensuring components can be deployed independently, focusing on loading only the necessary components for efficiency, employing a micro frontend implementation strategy for flexibility, using a web server like an express server for backend operations, detailing implementation details clearly for maintenance, establishing a cross team API for communication, and creating custom APIs for specific functionality.
English 
German 
Swedish 
Danish 
Norwegian 
Finnish 
French 
Arabic 
Italian 
Japanese 
Korean 
Polish